Search thousands of security reviews
Enter your wallet's name to get started, or use filters to narrow by platform and features.
Thousands of wallets reviewed, and counting.
Our wallet analysis process requires running 17 separate tests across various categories. This might sound excessive, but our thinking is that every compromised wallet, whether it's already popular or just released, has the potential to damage bitcoin's reputation or discourage future users.
Learn more about our methodology.
-
All tests passed.
202
The project either does not require binaries or the binaries provided are provably generated from the source provided.
-
Build issues or source-code issues.
11
Although some code was provided, we could not verify that the binary provided was generated from it.
-
User only gets an IOU.
1,061
The provider holds BTC on behalf of the user.
-
User gets a non-transferable IOU.
119
The provider might or might not hold BTC on behalf of the user but the user is not able to transfer native BTC.
-
Missing source code.
475
The provider does not provide all the source code needed to compile the product.
-
Untrustworthy handling of keys.
118
The product by design requires the exposure of the keys to other potentially less secure systems or blindly signs on behalf of such less secure systems.
-
Not relevant.
3,872
The product is not a BTC wallet, has little to no users, was not updated in a long time or is even defunct.
-
Fake.
50
The product is an imitation of a popular product and very likely fraudulent.
-
Pending review.
2,765
Products we know we have to look into.
Get involved
Support scrutiny.
WalletScrutiny is an independent, non-profit entity that depends on volunteers and donations. Have a thorough understanding of open-source bitcoin and feel like helping us review some wallets? Great. We'd love to hear from you. Don't know the first thing about code but want to support the people that do? Consider donating today.